UCLA，UC Berkerley, 这两所烂学校，就是你请我去我都不稀的去
Maggie Tian-911 04/22 52354.5/105
转帖， Today we received explicit consent from UCLA Political Science Professor Tim Groseclose to publish/reference in part or entirety a report Tim released on August 28, 2008 regarding his resignation from UCLA undergraduate “Committee on Undergraduate Admissions & Relations with Schools” (CUARS).
Here’s part of Tim email to us regarding the consent: “I give you my full permission (to post the article). Indeed, you can copy the report however you like and place the whole report or portions of it at whatever web site you like.”
Professor Tim Groseclose resigned in protest from CUARS in 2008 where he discovered UCLA was using racial preferences in its admission process. Whereas Tim was actually for affirmative action, he resigned in protest because he believes UCLA was trying to cover up its illegal activities in clear violation of Prop 209. It is the dishonesty and cover up that prompted his resignation.
If there is still any doubt that UCLA has been carrying on discriminatory admission process (the so called holistic approach) for years, one only needs to read Professor Groseclose’s Report, and the Mare Report commissioned by UCLA and written by UCLA Professor Robert Mare, as well as Research by UCLA Law Professor Richard Sander.
(Please see Mare’s report and Professor Sander’s Research in www.NoToSCA5.org under Forum/Articles of Interest)
We quote directly from Professor Groseclose’s Summary (P.2 of his report):
===============================================================
There is considerable evidence that high-ranking administrators and a controlling block of my committee are engaged in a cover-up – they are preventing me and others from obtaining these data so that the above malfeasance will not be discovered.
Because I cannot properly conduct the duties with which I am charged as a member of CUARS, I am therefore resigning, in protest, from the committee. To do otherwise would condone and make me complicit in what appears to be illegal activity.
…
A growing body of evidence strongly suggests that UCLA is cheating on admissions. Specifically, applicants often reveal their own race on the essay part of their application. This allows admissions staff members to learn the race of applicants; then in violation of Proposition 209, readers use such information to evaluate applicants.
